FOR SUBSCRIBERS

Expert: Merger between Lollands Bank and Møns Bank makes good sense

Banking expert Lars Krull believes that the two banks will be stronger together, but emphasises that it requires willingness - as both banks are already making good money on their own.

If Møns Bank and Lollands Bank were to end up merging, it would make good sense.
Published Modified

A merger between Lollands Bank and Møns Bank would be a natural step if the two banks themselves want it. This is the assessment from banking expert and senior advisor at Aalborg University Business School, Lars Krull.

- It makes good sense for them to come together. But these are two solid and well-run banks that are doing well on their own. So there must be a willingness on their part to do it if it is to happen, he says.

The two banks

Lollands Bank

  • Founded in 1907 with headquarters in Nakskov.

  • Branches on Lolland, Falster and South Zealand.

  • Result 2024: Profit after tax of 99 million DKK (131.3 million DKK before tax), compared to 142.3 million DKK the previous year.

  • Core earnings fell to 90.2 million DKK from 110.4 million DKK in 2023.

  • Return on equity after tax: 11.3 percent (14.1 percent the previous year).

  • Expecting a pre-tax result of 60-80 million DKK in 2025.

Møns Bank

  • Founded in 1877 with headquarters in Stege.

  • Branches in Næstved, Vordingborg, Præstø and Rønnede - and soon in Køge.

  • Result 2024: Profit before tax of 107 million DKK, slightly below the record year 2023 (114 million DKK).

  • New three-year growth strategy focusing on small and medium-sized business customers.

  • Expecting a pre-tax result of 40-70 million DKK in 2025.

The statement comes in the wake of SJF Bank's director, Lars Petersson, saying in an interview with Finanswatch that he would like to see the two banks merge - with SJF, formerly Sparekassen Sjælland-Fyn - as a friendly major shareholder. SJF Bank owns just under 25 percent of Lollands Bank and more than 10 percent of Møns Bank.

According to Petersson, the idea is that a larger entity can keep the cost percentage down and create more value for shareholders.

The motives behind

Lars Krull assesses that SJF Bank's interest in a merger also concerns the value of its own investments.

- They believe they could achieve a higher share value. In other words, more money out of their investment, he says.

He also points out that a merger would provide the opportunity to take greater risks and thus offer customers - especially business and agricultural customers - better conditions.

- A larger bank can take greater risks, and that is an advantage for all businesses. So a larger bank provides more opportunities for the agricultural sector, he says.

Two banks in profit 

The proposal is on the table not because the two banks are struggling. Quite the opposite. Lollands Bank delivered a pre-tax profit of 131.3 million DKK in 2024 and a post-tax profit of 99.0 million DKK. Core earnings fell from 110.4 million DKK to 90.2 million DKK, but the bank grew in both loans and deposits. For 2025, the bank expects 60-80 million DKK before tax due to lower market interest rates.

Møns Bank is also strong. 2024 ended with a pre-tax profit of 107 million DKK — slightly below the record year 2023, but better than expected. The bank points to positive interest effects, a low level of impairments, and solid core operations. At the same time, a three-year growth strategy is underway focusing on small and medium-sized business customers, and the bank has announced a new branch in Køge as part of the expansion.

What speaks against it?

When both banks are making money, a merger becomes a strategic choice, not a lifeline. This is also how Lars Krull sees it: 

- These are two small banks that might merge. A small thing in the banking world, but a big thing for them, it's close. 

And what speaks against it? 

- Nothing. At most, it could be someone's pride. It makes good sense from a business perspective.

The logic of a merger lies primarily in three aspects. Firstly, scale: combined balance, strengthened capital, and the ability to undertake larger commitments. Secondly, efficiency: a common platform can eventually reduce the cost percentage — a central argument in Petersson's statement. Thirdly, market position: a joint bank can stand stronger in the competition for business, especially agriculture, where the demand for financing, ESG documentation, and specialised advice is increasing.

SJF Bank's role 

SJF Bank has previously attempted to grow through acquisitions. Last year, the bank explored the possibility of taking over Nordfyns Bank but ended up selling its approximately 25 percent stake to Middelfart Sparekasse. The deal yielded a three-digit million profit.

With ownership stakes in both Lollands Bank and Møns Bank, SJF now plays a key role in the question of a merger. But without the banks' own willingness, nothing will happen.

The question is therefore whether the banks will see size as a strength - or maintain pride and independence.

Buy a subscription and get access

Already a subscriber? Log in here

Personal Subscription

  • Premium access to all content on FemernBusiness
  • Unlimited access to our full archive
  • Newsletters with the most important industry updates
  • Breaking news alerts when the biggest stories happen
  • Website login – stay updated with industry news on the go
Buy subscription

Try FehmarnBusiness for free for 14 days

  • Premium access to all content on FemernBusiness
  • Unlimited access to our full archive
  • Newsletters with the most important industry updates
  • Breaking news alerts when the biggest stories happen
  • Website login – stay updated with industry news on the go
Start free trial